{"id":4817,"date":"2014-06-05T09:48:51","date_gmt":"2014-06-05T07:48:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/finfers-the-names-of-fingers-digitus\/"},"modified":"2014-06-05T09:48:51","modified_gmt":"2014-06-05T07:48:51","slug":"finfers-the-names-of-fingers-digitus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/finfers-the-names-of-fingers-digitus\/","title":{"rendered":"The fingers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Each of the fingers has a name: thumb, index, middle finger, ring finger and little finger. But why are these names? Some names seem obvious; others are less so, but all must have reason, as in its origin with all the names that we apply to all beings<\/b><\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe Latin word &quot;digitus&quot; means &quot;<em>finger<\/em>&quot;, appendix of extremities, and it is also a <em>measure of length<\/em> equal to about 18 millimeters. As we learn to count on the fingers, also it means &quot;<em>figure or number<\/em>&quot;, from&nbsp; where on turn derives the current term &quot;<em>digital<\/em>&quot;. See: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/language-by-the-gesture-digital-computer\">https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/language-by-the-gesture-digital-computer<\/a> .<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe actual names of each of the fingers are a continuation of the Latin names and they are formed either from the position at hand, from some characteristic such as strength or size and from the role they&nbsp; can play.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em>St. Isidore of Seville<\/em> sums up it perfectly in his <em>Etymologies XI, 1, 70-71<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em><strong>On man and his parts<br \/>\n\tThe fingers (digitus) are so called, either because there are ten (decem) of the, or because they are connected handsomely (decenter), for the combine in them selves both the perfect number&nbsp; and the most appropriate order. The first finger is called thumb (pollex), vbecause among the rest it prevails (pollere) in strength and power . The sond is the index finger (index), which is also called &ldquo;greeter&rdquo; (salutaris) or pointer (demonsstratorius), because&nbsp; we greet someone (salutare) point something out (ostendere) usually&nbsp; with it. The third finger is called &ldquo;immodest&rdquo; (impudicus), because often an accusation of a shameful action is expressed by it.The fourth is the ring&nbsp; (anularis) finger, because it is the one on which the ring (annulus) is worn. It is also called medical (medicinalis), because physicians (medicus) use it to scoop up ground eye-salves.&nbsp; The fifth is called auricularis, because we use it to scrape out the ear (auris)<\/strong><\/em>. (Translated by&nbsp; Stephen A. Barney et alii. Cambridge University Press)<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em>De homine et partibus eius.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em>Digiti nuncupati, vel quia decem sunt, vel quia decenter existuntt. Nam habent in se et numerum perfectum et ordinem decentissimum. Primus pollex vocatus, eo quod inter caeteros polleat virtute, et potestate. Secundus index et salutaris, seu demonstratorius, quia fere eo salutamus, vel ostendimus. Tertius impudicus, quod plerumque per eum&nbsp; opprobrii insectatio exprimitur. Quartus anularis, eo quod in ipso anulus geritur. Idem et medicinalis, quod eo trita collyria a medicis colliguntur. Quintus auricularis, pro eo, quod eo aurem scalpimus.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\n\tIt&nbsp; should draw attention to the curious and elementary etymologies of&nbsp; <em>St. Isidore<\/em>, following in the footsteps of some famous Roman grammarians as <em>Varro<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tSo he says that they are called &ldquo;<em>digiti<\/em>&rdquo; (fingers) because they are&nbsp; &ldquo;<em>decem<\/em>&rdquo;, (ten) or because they coexist &ldquo;<em>decenter<\/em>&rdquo;, (&quot;decently, properly&quot;)&nbsp;&nbsp; in an clearly unjustified exercise of imagination. The truth is that there is not an <em>Indo-European<\/em> word for &quot;<strong>digitus<\/strong>&quot;,&nbsp; which seems rather a familiar form about which little can be said.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tBut it is correct&nbsp; the etymology of the first finger,&nbsp; <em>pollex<\/em>, (the <em>thumb<\/em>), which comes from <em>pulgaris <\/em>and this from <em>pollicaris <\/em>and this from &quot;<em>pollere<\/em>&quot;, &ldquo;<em>to be strong<\/em>&rdquo;. In some places it is also called &quot;f<em>lea dip<\/em>&quot; because so undesirable insects are killed with it, and there is for some people the explanation of why the current form is in Spanish &quot;<em>pulgar<\/em>&quot; (from &ldquo;<em>pulga<\/em>&rdquo;)&nbsp; and not &quot;<em>polgar<\/em>&quot; as it seems it should be derived from &quot;<em>pollicaris<\/em>&quot;; it would be a vulgar assimilation to &ldquo;<em>pulga<\/em>&rdquo; (<em>flea<\/em>). Rather the process however seems to have been the reverse: from <em>pollicaris<\/em>, it is deduced that <em>pulgaris <\/em>serves to kill the bugs.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe explanation about the second finger, &quot;<em>index<\/em>&quot; (<em>salutaris, demonstrativus<\/em>) also seems clear and obvious. For example, <em>Horace&nbsp; <\/em>have used it in their <em>Sermons&nbsp; (or Satires). 2.8, 20-26:<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em><strong>Myself at top, then Viscus, and below<br \/>\n\tWas Varius: after us came Balatro,<br \/>\n\tVibidius also, present at the treat<br \/>\n\tUnasked, as members of Maecenas&#39; suite.<br \/>\n\tPorcius and Nomentanus last, and he,<br \/>\n\tOur host, who lay betwixt them, made the three:<br \/>\n\tPorcius the undermost, a witty droll,<br \/>\n\tWho makes you laugh by swallowing cheesecakes whole:<br \/>\n\tWhile Nomentanus&#39; specialty was this,<br \/>\n\tTo point things out that vulgar eyes might miss;<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\n\t(Translation by John Conington, M.A. Corpus Professor of Latin in the University of Oxford).<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em>&#39;summus ego et prope me Viscus Thurinus et infra,<br \/>\n\tsi memini, Varius; cum Seruilio Balatrone<br \/>\n\tVibidius, quos Maecenas adduxerat umbras.<br \/>\n\tNomentanus erat super ipsum, Porcius infra,<br \/>\n\tridiculus totas semel absorbere placentas;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em>Nomentanus ad hoc, qui, siquid forte lateret,<br \/>\n\tindice monstraret digito;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe <em>third <\/em>finger is the &quot;<em>middle<\/em>&quot; &quot;<em>medius<\/em>&quot;, or large (<em>summus<\/em>), as it is called in Latin. Why St. Isidorus and the Romans called it <em>impudicus, infamis, famosus<\/em>? St.&nbsp; Isidorus explains only half, although his readers know exactly what he means. It, 2400 years ago as today,&nbsp; was the ugly, obscene and insulting gesture&nbsp; of &ldquo;<em>giving the finger<\/em>&rdquo; or &ldquo;<em>flipping the bird<\/em>&rdquo;, &ldquo;<em>short the bird<\/em>&rdquo;, which so much extension has acquired in recent times. It consists on&nbsp; maintaining the four closed fingers, lift the middle on a clear representation of the penis and testicles; it is a vulgar gesture that we read in vulgar terms like &quot;<em>to fuck off<\/em>&quot;. To this issue, see: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/digitus-impudicus-giving-the-finger\">https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/digitus-impudicus-giving-the-finger<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\n\t&nbsp;The <em>fourth <\/em>is called&nbsp; &ldquo;<em>anularis<\/em>&rdquo;, from &ldquo;<em>anulus<\/em>&rdquo; (&quot;<em>ring<\/em>&quot;) and also <em>honestus<\/em> and <em>medicus <\/em>in Latin,&nbsp; because in it the ring is worn as St. Isidore says.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t&quot;<em>anulus<\/em>&quot; comes from Latin <em>anus<\/em>, meaning <em>ring<\/em>,&nbsp; <em>in circular shape<\/em>. It is clear, then, why it is named so to the &quot;hole in the digestive tract ends and by which the excrement is expelled&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe name of this finger deserves its own article, because it is very much the ancient literature on the Roman rings, and on the fingers and hand in which it must to be carried. It is no less interesting to analyze why&nbsp; it is called &quot;<em>medical or doctor finge<\/em>r&quot; <em>St.&nbsp; Isidore<\/em> gives us a simple explanation, which may not be enough. <em>Aulus Gellius, Macrobius, Pliny <\/em>give us curious and less interesting&nbsp; news on this finger. We also discuss it in a separate article.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe fifth finger is called in Latin &quot;<em>ultimus<\/em>&quot;, &quot;<em>nimius<\/em>&quot; and &quot;<em>minimus<\/em>&quot;&nbsp; and <em>me&ntilde;ique<\/em>, &quot;<em>little<\/em>&quot;,&nbsp; in <em>Spanish<\/em> precisely because it is the smallest. The<em> Royal Spanish Academy<\/em> explains the term as &quot;<em>Crossing menino, child,&nbsp; and mermellique or&nbsp; margarique,&nbsp; variations of margarite, from old French margariz, renegade, traitor, paper sometimes attributed to this finger on sayings and fables<\/em>).&nbsp; In any case it involved with &ldquo;<em>minino<\/em>, <em>menino<\/em>,&nbsp; and these with <em>minimus<\/em>, <em>the smallest<\/em>. On English is equally obvious &quot;<em>Little Finge<\/em>r&quot; and in <em>French <\/em>&quot;<em>petit doigt<\/em>&quot;, in <em>German klein Finger<\/em>, <em>Italian mignolo, Catalan it petit, dedinho in Galician.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\n\tIt is also called &quot;<em>auricularis<\/em>&quot;, from &ldquo;<em>auricula<\/em>&rdquo;, the <em>ear<\/em>, by its adaptation to the function of picking ears.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Each of the fingers has a name: thumb, index, middle finger, ring finger and little finger. But why are these names? Some names seem obvious; others are less so, but all must have reason, as in its origin with all the names that we apply to all beings<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,6,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","category-habits","category-language-literature"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4817"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4817\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiquitatem.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}